Universal Periodic Review and Children in Zimbabwe
What is the Universal Periodic
Review?
The Universal Periodic Review (UPR) is a unique
process which involves a review of the human rights records of all 194 UN
Member States once every four years. The UPR is a significant innovation
of the Human Rights Council which is based on equal treatment for all
countries. It provides an opportunity for all States to declare what
actions they have taken to improve the human rights situations in their countries
and to overcome challenges to the enjoyment of human rights. The UPR also
includes a sharing of best human rights practices around the globe.
Objectives
of the UPR
•
to
address human rights violations,
•
improve
the human rights situation,
•
encourage
States to fulfill their human obligations and commitments,
•
assess
the positive developments and challenge,
•
enhance
the State's capacity,
•
provide
technical assistance and share best practices between stakeholders.
How are the reviews
conducted?
Reviews take place
through an interactive discussion between the State under review and other UN
Member States. This takes place during a meeting of the UPR Working
Group. During this discussion any UN Member State can pose questions,
comments and/or make recommendations to the States under review. The
troikas may group issues or questions to be shared with the State under review
to ensure that the interactive dialogue takes place in a smooth and orderly
manner. The duration of the review will be three hours for each country in
the Working Group.
Can non-governmental
organizations (NGOs) participate in the UPR process?
NGOs can submit
information which can be added to the “other stakeholders” report which is
considered during the review. Information they provide can be referred to
by any of the States taking part in the interactive discussion during the
review at the Working Group meeting. NGOs can attend the UPR Working Group
sessions and can make statements at the regular session of the Human Rights
Council when the outcome of the State reviews are considered.
When was the first review of Zimbabwe?
The review of Zimbabwe
took place on 10 and 12 October 2011 in Geneva, at the 12th Session
of the Universal Periodic Review by the United Nations Human Rights Concil. The
second phase was in March 2012, when the country then either accept or reject
the recommendations that had been set as under consideration.
Results of Zimbabwe’s UPR Review
A total of 177
recommendations for consideration by Zimbabwe to improve its human rights
situation came out of the UPR. The Government of Zimbabwe accepted 130 and
rejected 47 of these recommendations.
List of Child related recommendations:
Ratification and domestication of human rights
treaties
ü Sign and ratify the Optional Protocols to the
CRC on the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography and on
the involvement of children in armed conflict
ü Ratify the Convention on the Rights of Persons
with Disabilities
ü Ratify the United Nations Protocol to Prevent,
Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons especially Women and Children
ü Take concrete measures to align Zimbabwe’s
domestic laws, including customary laws, with international human rights
instruments that are party to, to ensure harmonization with the protections guaranteed
in the Constitution
General measures to implement human rights
ü Intensify effort to implement national
programmes that promote the rights of its people, including in the field of the
rights of children and women as well as rights to education, health, adequate
water and sanitation […]
ü
Undertake continued action
including legislation to address the marginalization of women, children and
other vulnerable groups from socio-economic and political spheres
Birth registration
ü Undertake a review with a view to ensuring a
coordinated system bridging gaps, especially with respect to the provision of
birth certificates
Prohibition of torture, inhuman and degrading
treatment
ü Prohibit corporal punishment as a form of
sentence as well as prohibit corporal punishment in all other settings
Orphans and vulnerable children
ü Continue to work according to the National
Action Plan II to focus on the situation of orphans and vulnerable children to
ensure their access to health care and education
ü Look into the matter of
orphans caught up in the battle for property within the Anglican Church and
ensure that orphans are being given experienced caretakers and have their basic
rights covered
ü Repriotitize resources to increase the budget
for basic education, including the provision of additional tuition assistance
to orphans and vulnerable children
ü Continue free access to education, notably for
girls and vulnerable children
Economic, social and cultural rights
ü Continue with positive actions and programmes
aimed at guaranteeing universal education and health services of quality to its
people as well as those aimed at reducing poverty
ü Concentrate more resources for the assurance
of economic and social rights and for the implementation of Millenium
Development Goals (MDG’s), in particular in the fields of education, healthcare
and social security
ü Continue to
take positive steps to enhance the enjoyment of economic, social and cultural
rights, especially in the areas of education, health and the care of the
disabled
ü Continue to invest heavily
in education at all levels, invest more in rural development where the majority
of women live, and seek technical assistance in the area of fighting disease
ü Further reduce
maternal and child mortality rates
ü Address the issue of school drop-out rates of
children and examine related issues of child malnutrition
ü Implement school meals
programmes and link them to local food production
Monitoring and Reporting
ü Create a system to collect updated and
disaggregated data on the situation of the rights of the child
Rejected
Recommendations:
×
Set a higher age of
criminal responsibility for children from 7 to 12 years and take all necessary measures to establish a
specialized juvenile justice system, where children are treated in accordance
with the principles of the best interest
of the child
×
Amend expeditiously the
Birth and Death Registration Act to ensure that all children born in Zimbabwe,
regardless of their parents’ origin are issued with birth certificates
What
happens if a State is not cooperating with the UPR?
The Human Rights
Council will decide on the measures it would need to take in case of persistent
non-cooperation by a State with the UPR.
For further information:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_Periodic_Review.
No comments:
Post a Comment